amazon web services - Down Side of Keeping Unused Platform Endpoints in AWS SNS -


to keep question short:

are there down sides of keeping unused platform endpoints in aws sns?

long story:

we storing platform endpoints arn in database, reason need delete of them database.

in situation arn stored in aws sns won't deleted. thus, these arns become inaccessible, service won't know these arns.

so short version of question: there down sides of doing so?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

go - serving up pdfs using golang -

Image
just wondering if guys can code. it works serving images not pdf brochure. in advance func main(){ http.handlefunc("/", func(w http.responsewriter, r *http.request){ filename := "/var/www/filedipenser/brochure.pdf" streampdfbytes, err := ioutil.readfile( filename ) if err != nil { fmt.println(err) os.exit(1) } b := bytes.newbuffer(streampdfbytes) w.header().set("content-type", "application/pdf") if _, err := b.writeto(w); err != nil { fmt.fprintf(w, "%s", err) } w.write([]byte("pdf generated")) }) err := http.listenandserve(":4111", nil) if err != nil { log.fatal("listenandserve: ", err) fmt.println(err) } } the code bit inefficient appears working. however, pdf viewers might sensitive extraneous output adding end of http response stream...
Read more

python - Best design pattern for collection of objects -

i have following architecture: +-----------------+ | collection | | | | | | | | | +-----------------+ | ^ | | create() | | | | v | getitem(b) +------------+ | | item | | | | | | +------+ | | +------------+ a class managing collection of items, creates items. , these items may need other items collection. the actual code in python, , collection passes parameter created item . see it, bad practice. improvement can see pass few functions of collection needed item , instead of whole instance. for example: class collection: getitem(self, id): ... createitem(self, id): item = item(id, self) # <-- pass self ... class item: __init__(self, id, col): ... col.getite...
Read more

r - Using `bbmle:mle2` with vector parameters (already works using `optim`) -

i having trouble using bbmle:mle2 function when trying regression. illustrate problem, have come toy example. we define minus log-likelihood poisson distribution (or custom distribution): ll <- function(beta, z, x){ -sum(stats::dpois(x, lambda = exp(z %*% beta), log = true)) } in code above, beta parameter vector estimate, z model/design matrix , x variable of interest. i generate random data work with: set.seed(2) age <- round(exp(rnorm(5000, mean = 2.37, sd = 0.78) - 1)) claim <- rpois(5000, lambda = 0.07 i can use optim regression. here intercept model: z1 <- model.matrix(claim ~ 1) optim(par = 0, fn = ll, z = z1, x = claim) here intercept + age model: z2 <- model.matrix(claim ~ age) optim(par = c(0, 0), fn = ll, z = z2, x = claim) the way large number of different models can assessed quite easy, 1 has specify model matrix. how can made work mle2 function bbmle package? i can it, if beta one-dimensional: mle2(minuslogl = functio...
Read more